Employee Training Ends At Competence

I got into a conversation recently (on a Human Resources Message Board) with a Management Consultant. His questions got me to thinking. He asked for a further clarification of my assertion that an employer's responsibility to improve its employees ends once they become competent at the job. The following is my clarification.

When an employer goes looking for a potential employee, they are looking for someone who can accomplish the job. They are not looking for someone to exceed expectations or they would have advertised that. They just want someone merely competent. And if they find that competent person, if the person doesn't improve over time and if the job doesn't change, they will be happy with their employee for years to come. If the employee can live with doing the same job every day getting the same paycheck every week and not testing his/her abilities, then they have a match. The company only requires someone competent. Nothing more.

However, over time we all know the employee will eventually begin to feel they are being taken advantage of. They haven't been given big raises (but the job hasn't changed either) and they become disgruntled. The company however, doesn't feel they need to pay more. The job hasn't changed, the responsibilities haven't changed and the employee is doing exactly the job that was originally advertised.

The company is only responsible for training the employee to do the job. That's it. If you take the job you agree to the expectations. If you are better than the job then don't take the job. Clearly you will not be happy. If you are under skilled for the job, then I'm not sure the company would hire you but if they did, their responsibility for "training" ends once you are able to do the job competently.

In order to better one's position in life, they have to become more valuable. It's not the company's job to make the individual better. Sure, the company can provide an environment where self-improvement is encouraged but ultimately it's not the company's responsibility to improve the individual beyond the expectations of being able to do the job. That's it.

However, as an employee, one can't use the excuse that they won't improve because the company won't pay for it. (Anyone who would dare say that in my shop would be fired immediately and I would gladly pay the legal bills to get rid of a cancer like that.) Sitting on the sofa watching TV reruns is no replacement for opening a book and becoming better at the job or better as a person.

We have to all accept accountability. We are what we are and where we are in our lives by our own doing. We have said "yes" all the way along. It's how we ended up where we are. Now, if we are being paid what we are perceived to be worth (and we are), wouldn't it make sense to self-improve, get better at the job or the next job up the ladder, raise our worth, raise our profile, raise our stock which, in turn, would raise our paychecks?

If you won't raise your personal worth, why should the company pay more? If the job hasn't changed and the individual hasn't changed then the paycheck shouldn't change.

One can't ever use the excuse "that's all the company pays" for not doing better. Look around. There are others in the company making more than you. The truth really is, "That's all the company pays ... you."

The company will do whatever is necessary to keep a high-performer (including money, status, position, perks, etc.). The company will do little to upset the apple cart of someone who is doing a competent job.

In a nutshell, here's a simplistic overview of how a company can run a clean ship (organization): 1) Don't mess with what's working (competent employees). 2) Do whatever is necessary to keep the superstar (high-performer). 3) Get rid of the deadwood (under-achiever).

It's imperative that the individual honestly figures out where they, as an individual, are on that scale. The company makes their choices based on #1 and #2. That's their choice. The individual now must figure out where they are on the scale and hope that it's not #3.